Thursday, March 12, 2009

Disrupting Class

Charonda O’Bryant-Hopkins
Prof. J. Lerman
Computer Applications/5541
Disrupting Class
March 11, 2009

As an educator in the American public education system, I found the book Disrupting Class to be a fascinating and persuasive read and a pertinent framework for administrators, teachers, parents and policymakers. Dr. Christiansen and his co-authors challenge reader’s beliefs about learning and teaching in our schools. Disrupting Class is inspiring yet thought provoking and argues the need for institutional change and the need to improve the American public education system.

Two major points that Christiansen discuss which resonates strongly with me, is the importance of adapting teaching techniques to different learning styles and moving schools to a student-centric model through the use of computer-based technology using disruptive innovation theory. Christiansen like Gardner builds his approach to reading instruction rather than the standard public school curriculum. In addition, he believes that technology is the new wave of the 21st century and institutions must embrace innovative learning with interactive educational media, which includes new rich media software and connectivity.

Undoubtedly, I agree with the authors that there are large populations of students who are under served by the current model of education. Many institutions lack structure, a rigorous curriculum, differentiated teaching and are extraneous with many students. Due to the poor infrastructure in many of our educational systems, numerous students have difficulty learning and are unable to comprehend and retain information that is being taught. As a result, many students irregularly attend school or drop out of school. The large percentage of students who do not graduate in the public school system supports my position. Nevertheless, I believe that installing computer-based instruction, which connects individual students with self-paced interactive learning will challenge students critical thinking and cognitive skills and allow them to become more creative.

As a school principal, I am certain that I will try to be resourceful in building partnerships that will provide students with the resources that they need to become successful. Also, I will strive to work with teachers to ensure that are providing students with differentiated instruction and serve as a mentor and coach for teachers. Parents will be provided with current information on educational issues and concerns as they arise. They will receive learning strategy techniques and computer-training classes, which will allow them to stay abreast of the latest technology, so that they could better tutor their child. Everyone will have to be dedicated and work harmoniously. Ultimately, this will give students the confidence that they need to become high achievers, raise test scores, meet AYP and prepare students to move on to two and four year institutions and technical and business schools.

2 comments:

  1. Thanks for your post. I think you've charted an ambitious strategy ahead--and I wish you the best of luck!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Charonda's comments and view on preparing students and schools for rigorous curriculum, more intense strategies and differentiated instructional methods for students and teachers in futrure schools. Students need to be exposed to varied forms of technology inside and outside of the classroom. With this in mind, teachers and instructional leaders must continue to learn and grow in their usage in technology in the classroom. Teachers can only take their students as far as they have gone themselves. So if we as future leaders would like to see our students, schools and staff perform above and beyond. We must learn to go above and beyond as well for the sake of our children and education.

    ReplyDelete